Y Tu Mamá También (2001)

Two boys in love who couldn’t outrun the prison of their own masculinity.

This has been a major blindspot for me. One of those movies I knew I would like but kept putting off. And for most of the runtime, it’s exactly what I expected - a breezy, naturalistic hangout with a couple of horny idiots and an absolute angel willing to indulge them. I was having a great time. Then the film started doing something else entirely.

The friendship between Julio and Tenoch was never separate from the women it was routed through. They masturbate side by side. They sleep with each other’s girlfriends. They build an entire code - the charolastra manifesto - to license intimacy that has no other permitted form. The desire between them is always there; it just needs a proxy to be expressible. Luisa’s function is to collapse that triangle. She makes the mediation literal and then removes herself from it. Once they’ve touched each other directly, without her in the middle, the architecture that let them love each other for years is gone. They have no vocabulary for what happened. So the friendship simply cannot continue in any register they know.

Masculinity as performance. Masculinity as costume. And once they took it off - even for a moment - they couldn’t figure out how to put it back on.

Class does the other half of the work. Tenoch’s father is a PRI government official. Julio’s mother is a secretary. The trip is a suspended space where those facts can be temporarily bracketed - two boys on the road, equal in their horniness and their bullshit. Back in Mexico City, the class difference reasserts itself immediately. The café scene is so formal. They’re already performing adult roles at each other. The friendship dies of the country as much as the kiss.

I’ll admit I don’t fully understand the political context - the fall of the PRI after 71 years of rule, the effects of NAFTA, the economic crisis. But I can feel it in the film. The narrator keeps pulling focus to background characters whose futures are already foreclosed - a fisherman whose livelihood will be destroyed by tourism, families displaced by development. Mexico is changing around these boys and they drive past without noticing. Their obliviousness is the point.

The narrator has been foreclosing futures the entire film - telling you about deaths and displacements the characters walk past without noticing. By the end, you realize the whole movie has been an elegy. For Luisa. For the friendship. For a version of Mexico that was already disappearing.

The film spends two hours letting you read Luisa the way the boys read her - as an initiator, a fantasy, someone whose story is what she does for them. Then it reveals she knew about the cancer before she ever got in the car. The trip was her exit, not their coming of age. The ending’s coldness redistributes your grief. You thought this was their story. It was hers. And they never understood what they were given.

I wasn’t ready for this. I thought I was watching a horny coming of age hangout movie. I was watching a tragedy.

Also on Letterboxd