Cloud Centers of Excellence (Part 3): FinOps, Cost Management, and Real-World Case Studies
This post was originally published on CloudQuery's blog.

|8 min read

Cloud Centers of Excellence (Part 3): FinOps, Cost Management, and Real-World Case Studies

Designing a Cloud Center of Excellence blog post header

About This Series: This is Part 3 of our 5-part series on Cloud Centers of Excellence (CCOEs). Catch up on previous parts:

Note: TL;DR: Managing cloud spend has overtaken security as the #1 cloud challenge, with 82% of organizations citing cost management as their top priority. Modern CCOEs have evolved to embed FinOps practices, implementing tagging standards, chargeback mechanisms, and automated cost optimization that can save millions annually. Real-world case studies from Capital One, Commerzbank, and other major enterprises demonstrate how mature CCOEs strike a balance between innovation and financial discipline, achieving 20-40% cost reductions while accelerating time-to-market by 30%. The rise of dedicated FinOps teams (now in 59% of organizations) often stems from initial CCOE cost governance efforts.

As cloud usage scales, controlling cost and ensuring financial accountability become major concerns, giving rise to FinOps (Cloud Financial Operations) as a discipline. A critical role of modern CCOEs is to implement FinOps practices and embed cost governance into cloud management. In many organizations, the CCOE either houses a FinOps function or closely coordinates with a dedicated FinOps team to drive cost optimization and accountability.

Cloud Cost Management as a Top Challenge

Cloud costs can spiral without proper oversight, idle resources, over-provisioning, and a lack of visibility often lead to waste. Industry surveys over the past few years have underscored this challenge. By 2022, managing cloud spend had surpassed security as the number one cloud challenge reported by enterprises. In Flexera’s 2023 survey, 82% of respondents cited cost management as a top challenge, edging out security (77%). Correspondingly, “optimizing existing cloud use (cost savings) has been the top initiative for seven years running” (reported by 62% of organizations in 2023). This shift has elevated FinOps from a niche practice to a mainstream component of cloud governance.

The CCOE is often tasked to ensure cloud cost governance through FinOps. In some companies, this means the CCOE includes a FinOps specialist or cost manager, while in others, the CCOE works in partnership with a formal FinOps team. Either way, the objectives are to achieve cost visibility, optimize spending, and instill financial accountability for cloud consumption.

Key FinOps Practices via CCOE

According to the FinOps Foundation and industry glossaries, a CCOE enables FinOps by centralizing cost policies and tooling. Some core functions include:

Meme image of a determined-looking toddler clenching his fist in success (known as "Success Kid"). The background is a blue and purple radial burst. Text at the top reads: "PUBLISHED QUARTERLY COE METRICS". Text at the bottom reads: "MANAGEMENT LOVED IT."

FinOps Team Integration

A notable development is the rise of dedicated FinOps teams in large organizations. The latest Flexera State of the Cloud reports indicate a steady increase in companies with FinOps teams. In 2022, about half of the surveyed companies had a FinOps team; by 2023/24, that number grew, and 59% of organizations had a FinOps team in 2024, up from 51% a year prior (see Figure 3). Often, these FinOps teams either reside within the CCOE or work hand-in-hand with it. For example, a bank might have a FinOps group under the CFO, but that group works closely with the Cloud CoE under IT, the CoE provides the cloud expertise and tooling, while FinOps brings financial rigor and reporting structures.

Two circular donut charts compare how many organizations say their FinOps team performs some or all related tasks. The chart on the left shows 51% in 2024, and the chart on the right shows 59% in 2025. The green portions represent the percentage of positive responses. Text above the charts reads: "Yes, our FinOps team does some/all of these tasks."

Figure 3: Percentage of organizations with a FinOps team (51% in 2024, increasing to 59% in 2025).** This trend demonstrates growing recognition of the need for formal cloud cost governance. A Cloud CoE often seeds the creation of a FinOps practice by highlighting cost issues and setting up initial governance; as maturity grows, a specialized FinOps team can take on the day-to-day financial management, reporting into the CoE governance framework. In many cases, the CCOE charter explicitly includes “cost optimization” as one of its primary objectives, meaning the CoE is accountable to leadership for maintaining cloud economics.

Chargeback/Showback and Accountability Structures

To drive accountability, CCOEs implement chargeback (billing business units for their cloud usage) or Showback (showing usage costs without actual billing, for transparency). Kyndryl notes that with a cloud CoE, “budget and resource management improves for cloud cost allocation, tagging, and cost charge-backs and show-backs to business units, ensuring complete cost transparency”. The effect is that business leaders see the real costs of the services they consume, which often incentivizes them to support optimization efforts. For instance, a product manager who sees a chargeback report that their application spent $100k on cloud last month (with a spike over budget) is more likely to prioritize cost-efficiency improvements. The CCOE may govern the chargeback model, determining how shared costs (such as networking or support costs) are allocated and ensuring they are perceived as fair and accurate.

FinOps Tools and Automation

CCOEs also select and manage tools for FinOps: this might include cloud cost management platforms (e.g., CloudHealth, Flexera, Apptio Cloudability) and implementing automation like automated alerts for anomalous spending (e.g., if a daily spend exceeds baseline by X%, trigger notification). Some organizations take it a step further with policy engines that can, for example, shut down resources that violate cost policies (such as an unapproved instance type being spun up). Google Cloud’s native recommendation system or AWS’s Cost Anomaly Detection are often leveraged through the CoE to catch inefficiencies automatically. The CoE can aggregate these across multi-cloud environments as well, using multi-cloud cost dashboards if the company uses more than one provider. Flexera’s 2023 report found that among large enterprises, usage of multi-cloud cost management tools (FinOps tools) slightly exceeded usage of multi-cloud security tools (68% vs 63%), indicating that cost optimization is now a prominent focus of tooling investments, on par with security.

Case in Point

Consider a large European bank’s CCOE, which set a goal to reduce cloud waste by 20% in a year. The CCOE’s FinOps unit analyzed cost reports and identified hundreds of idle development virtual machines and over-provisioned databases. By implementing an organization-wide “cleanup day” and deploying an automation script to delete unattached storage, they were able to save a significant sum. They also renegotiated contracts with their cloud provider for committed use discounts (something a CoE can do at an enterprise level). According to Flexera’s data, an estimated 27% of enterprise cloud spend is wasted on average. A capable CCOE/FinOps effort targets that waste, turning it into savings or more efficient spending. Many companies report multi-million-dollar savings after establishing FinOps governance. For example, having engineers accountable for costs led to rightsizing, which saved one company 40% on certain workloads.

In essence, FinOps has become a core pillar of CCOEs. Through a mix of policy (central tagging standards, budgets), process (cost reviews, training), and tooling (dashboards, alerts, automation), the CCOE ensures that the benefits of cloud’s flexibility do not come at the expense of financial discipline. This addresses a key concern of CIOs and CFOs alike: that cloud spend remains aligned with business value. It also fosters a partnership between IT and Finance, a cultural shift where engineers start thinking about cost (traditionally a finance concern), and finance teams become more agile in understanding IT consumption. The Cloud CoE, straddling both worlds, is the ideal entity to facilitate this cross-functional collaboration for cost governance. As one FinOps slogan puts it: “Finance and Engineering in collaboration,” that is exactly the kind of collaboration a CCOE can institutionalize.

Key Takeaways

The evolution of CCOEs to embrace FinOps reflects a fundamental shift in cloud maturity. What started as a technology adoption challenge has become a financial management discipline. The most successful CCOEs we’ve examined don’t just manage cloud costs - they create a culture of financial accountability that spans engineering, finance, and business teams.

The case studies reveal several critical success patterns:

  • Quantified outcomes that tie cloud governance to business value
  • Cultural transformation that makes cost awareness part of engineering DNA
  • Automation-first approaches that scale governance without creating bottlenecks
  • Cross-functional collaboration that breaks down traditional IT and finance silos

As we’ve seen, mature CCOEs can deliver transformational results: 20-40% cost reductions, 30% faster time-to-market, and millions in annual savings. But these outcomes require more than just good intentions, and they demand systematic implementation of proven practices.

Coming Up

In Part 4 of this series, we’ll provide the tactical roadmap for building your own CCOE. We’ll cover the step-by-step implementation process, common pitfalls that can derail your efforts, and specific strategies for avoiding the “cloud gatekeeper” trap that has plagued many organizations. Whether you’re starting from scratch or improving an existing CCOE, Part 4 will give you the practical guidance you need.

Continue to Part 4: Implementation Best Practices and Common Pitfalls

Joe Karlsson

Joe Karlsson

Developer Marketing Engineer at CData, leading developer growth for the managed MCP platform that connects AI agents to live enterprise data. Writing about databases, self-hosting, and the things I build. Runs a 60+ container Proxmox homelab with AI-powered automations.

cat newsletter.md

I write a weekly newsletter about databases, self-hosting, and whatever I'm building.

Subscribe on Substack →

Related Posts